CO129-233 - Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [6-8] — Page 418

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Franz Opium
Dow...

or certain balls of Raw Opium and the proceeds of sale thereof, to which the said Defendant is entitled, subject to any Claim, Lien or Right of the said Otto Franz von Mollendorff AND ALSO that the said Otto Franz von Mollendorff be, and he is hereby prohibited and restrained, until the further Order of this Court, from delivering the said Property to any Person or Persons whomsoever

EXTRACT
From "The Hongkong Code of Civil Procedure," Part III c. 12, as to the Service and Effect of Prohibitory Orders.

403

Para. 8. "In the Case of Goods, Chattels, or other movable Property not in the Possession of the Defendant, an Office Copy of the Order shall be delivered to the Person in Possession of the Property. In the Case of Lands, Houses, or other immovable Property, or any Interest therein, an Office Copy of the Order shall be registered in the Land Office under Ordinance No. 8 of 1844. In the Case of Debts, Office Copies of the Order shall be delivered to or served upon each individual Debtor. And in Case of Shares in the Capital or Joint-stock of any public Company or Corporation, an Office Copy of the Order shall be delivered to or served upon the Manager, Secretary, or other proper Officer of the Company or Corporation.”

Para. 9. "After any Attachment shall have been made by actual Seizure, or by written Order as aforesaid, and in the Case of an Attachment by written Order, after it shall have been duly intimated and made known in Manner aforesaid, any Alienation without Leave of the Court of the Property attached, whether by Sale, Gift, or otherwise, and any Payment of the Debt or Debts or Dividends, or Shares to the Defendant during the Continuance of the Attachment, shall be null and void.”

WITNESS
Sir George Phillippo
Chief Justice of our said Court at Hongkong
The 10th day of January A.D. 1886

(Signed) C. of Arangeter
Deputy Registrar.

Edit History

2026-05-25 19:11:21 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

IT IS ORDERED that the said Defendant be, and is hereby prohibited and restrained, until the further Order of this Court, from receiving from Otto Franz von Mollendorff the following Property in the Possession of the said Otto Franz von Mollendorff, that is to say :- Franz Opium Dow... or certain balls of Raw Opium and the proceeds of sale thereof, to which the said Defendant is entitled, subject to any Claim, Lien or Right of the said Otto Franz von Mollendorff AND ALSO that the said Otto Franz von Mollendorff be, and he is hereby prohibited and restrained, until the further Order of this Court, from delivering the said Property to any Person or Persons whomsoever EXTRACT From "The Hongkong Code of Civil Procedure," Part III c. 12, as to the Service and Effect of Prohibitory Orders. 403 Para. 8. "In the Case of Goods, Chattels, or other movable Property not in the Possession of the Defendant, an Office Copy of the Order shall be delivered to the Person in Possession of the Property. In the Case of Lands, Houses, or other immovable Property, or any Interest therein, an Office Copy of the Order shall be registered in the Land Office under Ordinance No. 8 of 1844. In the Case of Debts, Office Copies of the Order shall be delivered to or served upon each individual Debtor. And in Case of Shares in the Capital or Joint-stock of any public Company or Corporation, an Office Copy of the Order shall be delivered to or served upon the Manager, Secretary, or other proper Officer of the Company or Corporation.” Para. 9. "After any Attachment shall have been made by actual Seizure, or by written Order as aforesaid, and in the Case of an Attachment by written Order, after it shall have been duly intimated and made known in Manner aforesaid, any Alienation without Leave of the Court of the Property attached, whether by Sale, Gift, or otherwise, and any Payment of the Debt or Debts or Dividends, or Shares to the Defendant during the Continuance of the Attachment, shall be null and void.” WITNESS Sir George Phillippo Chief Justice of our said Court at Hongkong The 10th day of January A.D. 1886 (Signed) C. of Arangeter Deputy Registrar.

Baseline (Original)

AT ! IT IS ORDERED that the said Defendant be, and is hereby prohibited and restrained, mi the further Order of this Court, from receiving from Otto Franz the following Property in the Possession of the said that is to say :- von Mollendor Off Franz Opium Dow Mollendorf Section LXXVI. or certam certain balls of Raw sale thereof. the proceeds of to which the said Defendant is entitled, subject to any Claim, Lien or Right of the said Otto Franz Vow Mollendorff AND AND ALSO that the said Otto Franz von Mollende be, and he is hereby prohibited and restrained, until the further Order of this Court, from delivering the said Property to any Person or Persons whomsoever EXTRACT From The Hongkong Code of Civil Procedure," Part III c. 12, as to the Service and Effect of Prohibitory Orders. 403 Para. 8. "In the Case of Goods, Clinttels, or other movable Property not in the Possession of the Defendant, an Office Copy of the Order shall be delivered to the Person in Possession of the Property. In the Case of Lands, Houses, or other immovable Property, or any Interest therein, an Office Copy of the Order shall be registered in the Land Office under Ordinance No. 8 of 1844. In the Case of Debts, Office Copies of the Order shall be delivered to or served upon ench individual Debtor. And in Case of Shares in the Capital or Joint-stock of any public Company or Corporation, an Office Copy of the Order shall be delivered to or served upon the Manager, Secretary, or other proper Officer of the Company or Corporation.” Para. 9. After any Attachment shall have been made by actual Seizure, or by written Order as aforesaid, and in the Case of an Attrichment by written Order, after it shall have been duly intimated and made known in Manner aforesaid, any Alienation without Leave of the Court of the Property attached, whether by Sale, Gift, or otherwise, and any Payment of the Debt or Debts or Dividends, or Shares to the Defendant during the Continuance of the Attachment, shall be null and void.” WITNESS Sir George Thillippo Chief Justice of our said Court at Hongkong The 10th day of A.D. 1886 January 1!!! (Shpend) C. of Arangeter Deputy Registras.

2026-05-25 19:11:21 · Baseline

View content

IT IS ORDERED that the said Defendant be, and is hereby prohibited and restrained, mi

the further Order of this Court, from receiving from Otto Franz

the following Property in the Possession of the said

that is to say :-

von Mollendor

Off

Franz Opium

Dow

Mollendorf

Section LXXVI.

or certam

certain balls of Raw

sale thereof.

the proceeds of

to which the said Defendant is entitled, subject to any Claim, Lien or Right of the said Otto

Franz

Vow

Mollendorff AND

AND ALSO that the said Otto Franz von Mollende

be, and he is hereby prohibited and restrained, until the further Order of this Court, from delivering

the said Property to any Person or Persons whomsoever

EXTRACT

From The Hongkong Code of Civil Procedure," Part III c. 12,

as to the Service and Effect of Prohibitory Orders.

403

Para. 8. "In the Case of Goods, Clinttels, or other movable Property not in the Possession of the Defendant, an Office Copy of the Order shall be delivered to the Person in Possession of the Property. In the Case of Lands, Houses, or other immovable Property, or any Interest therein, an Office Copy of the Order shall be registered in the Land Office under Ordinance No. 8 of 1844. In the Case of Debts, Office Copies of the Order shall be delivered to or served upon ench individual Debtor. And in Case of Shares in the Capital or Joint-stock of any public Company or Corporation, an Office Copy of the Order shall be delivered to or served upon the Manager, Secretary, or other proper Officer of the Company or Corporation.”

Para. 9. After any Attachment shall have been made by actual Seizure, or by written Order as aforesaid, and in the Case of an Attrichment by written Order, after it shall have been duly intimated and made known in Manner aforesaid, any Alienation without Leave of the Court of the Property attached, whether by Sale, Gift, or otherwise, and any Payment of the Debt or Debts or Dividends, or Shares to the Defendant during the Continuance of the Attachment, shall be null and void.”

WITNESS

Sir George Thillippo

Chief

Justice of our said Court at Hongkong

The 10th

day of

A.D. 1886

January 1!!!

(Shpend) C. of Arangeter

Deputy Registras.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.